Tonight we have a couple of friends coming over for dinner. When we arranged it we were told that the girl "doesn't like white wine" and maybe we could find something she did like.
A challenge? Oh, alright then!
We've decided to do a 3 course "wine tasting" menu, each choosing one of our favourite whites and picking the food to compliment the wines.
To start we'll be having Dr Loosen Ürziger Würzgarten Riesling Kabinett with Thai style scallops.
Main course is Arnaud de Lassalle 2010 Pouilly-Fumé with sea bream, crushed potatoes and sauce vierge.
For dessert, Concha y Toro Late Harvest Sauvignon Blanc accompanied by vanilla panacotta and raspberry sauce.
And for an aperitif we have some Three Choirs May Hill
Hopefully there's something in there our guest will like!
Friday 29 June 2012
Tuesday 27 September 2011
Palmers Wine Store
We were on holiday in Dorset last week, found a really great wine shop. Palmers Wine Store in Bridport Has a really great selection of old world, new world wines and vintage ports. This Yangarra Mourvedre was particularly good.
And it's attached to the brewery so you can taste and buy some of the local beer whilst you are there.
Not quite the same as good old Palmer Wines on the Wokingham Road...
And it's attached to the brewery so you can taste and buy some of the local beer whilst you are there.
Not quite the same as good old Palmer Wines on the Wokingham Road...
Thursday 21 April 2011
Reading Beer Festival - Mike's Mëga MetÅle Træil
Really looking forward to Reading Beer Festival next weekend. In combination with the lead guitarist of my old metal band I have come up with the following Ale Trail based on the Metal related beers on the list.
- Satans Sister - Best Mates
- Cloven Hoof Vanilla Stout or Black Monk Mild - Concrete Cow
- 666 Devil's Brew - Stroud
- Mötley Brew - Otley
- Black - Barlow
- Dragon Hunter - Elland
- Anvil Ale, Blacksmiths Gold, Hammer and Tongs or Sledgehammer - Old Forge
- Excalibur - Pilgrim
- Dragon Slayer - Walls
- Monkmans Slaughter - Cropton
Feel free to join me. Maybe I should get t-shirts made.
Thursday 14 April 2011
"Expensive wine and cheap plonk taste the same to most people"
So The Guardian, home of Bad Science, today has this headline slapped by a giant image on it's home page leading to this article.
There are a few things wrong with this story and the research behind it it's made me even want to blog about it. Even though I don't dispute it's findings.
The headline doesn't match the story.
The research presented shows that people couldn't tell which wine was more expensive. This doesn't mean they thought they tasted the same does it?
We're in quite a good situation in the UK now, we get decent well made wine at all price points. You can get a drinkable wine for £3. For my own personal enjoyment I'd quite likely choose a £6 Chilean Red Blend over a £25 White Burgundy. Which was true before I started to learn about wine, the difference being now, hopefully, I could recognise the difference in quality between the two. Previously I'd have just said the Chilean one was better.
Maybe people just voted for the one they liked best?
Price doesn't directly equate to quality.
Even if you can judge the quality there are a ton of other things affecting the price of wine. Not all of them mean what you are drinking is higher quality. There are a lot of wine snobs who just want to spend a lot on wine as a status thing, but I've probably met a greater proportion of people interested in wine who are always on the look out for a bargain. This Gran Tesoro Garanacha from Tesco is still an absolute bargain at just over £4. Tastes like it cost twice that.
This is probably the most fundamental flaw with the research. Even though they were choosing similar blends/grapes from similar regions that doesn't mean that the price will reflect the quality. Look at any Decanter tasting and you'll see cheaper wines outperforming more expensive ones when judged by experts.
How good were the wines?
Would have been really good to have a bunch of "wine experts" blind taste the same wines and see how their perceptions matched the general public. It might be that the 'public' were super accurate and it was a freak set of wines where the cheap ones really were as good as the expensive ones. I've had a £15 Bordeaux that I thought was more unbalanced than that Gran Tesoro. What if the people conducting the experiment uncovered bargain priced hidden gems? Or had some overpriced stinkers?
We know that qualified experts are pretty good blind tasters, they can usually tell what a wine is made from, how it was made, what's in it and where it was from. It's part of any good qualification system. So their opinion does carry some weight.
You could take 580 members of the public to a gallery, show them a nice Art Student's painting and a Pollock and ask them which was more expensive. I suspect you'd get similar results.
Conclusions
So, taking all those points together, would you expect the average punter to be able to identify the price of a wine based on a blind taste? To be able to pick a price of a wine you really have to understand, what the wine is, where it comes from, how it was made and what the quality is. That's not easy. We had to do it as part of our WSET courses, and whilst I got the price right on the exam, I know that in the practices I frequently got it horribly wrong.
The thing I agree with is that, if you don't really care about wine, you might as well spend £5* as £20 on a bottle. And sometimes, when you do care about wine, you are better off spending £5 on a bargain than £20 on some overpriced monstrosity. Just like there'd be no point paying for the Pollock if you thought the Art Student's painting would look nicer on your wall.
So, with all that in mind why wasn't the headline "a small number of the general public perform just as averagely at a slightly crap experiment about tasting wine as you'd expect" and why is it a front page of the website story?
*or £3 if you find a decent one!
There are a few things wrong with this story and the research behind it it's made me even want to blog about it. Even though I don't dispute it's findings.
The headline doesn't match the story.
The research presented shows that people couldn't tell which wine was more expensive. This doesn't mean they thought they tasted the same does it?
We're in quite a good situation in the UK now, we get decent well made wine at all price points. You can get a drinkable wine for £3. For my own personal enjoyment I'd quite likely choose a £6 Chilean Red Blend over a £25 White Burgundy. Which was true before I started to learn about wine, the difference being now, hopefully, I could recognise the difference in quality between the two. Previously I'd have just said the Chilean one was better.
Maybe people just voted for the one they liked best?
Judging the quality of wine is a skill.
Until I started being taught about wine, I wouldn't have been able to tell you how to measure quality. I could tell you what I liked, but not why.
Price doesn't directly equate to quality.
Even if you can judge the quality there are a ton of other things affecting the price of wine. Not all of them mean what you are drinking is higher quality. There are a lot of wine snobs who just want to spend a lot on wine as a status thing, but I've probably met a greater proportion of people interested in wine who are always on the look out for a bargain. This Gran Tesoro Garanacha from Tesco is still an absolute bargain at just over £4. Tastes like it cost twice that.
This is probably the most fundamental flaw with the research. Even though they were choosing similar blends/grapes from similar regions that doesn't mean that the price will reflect the quality. Look at any Decanter tasting and you'll see cheaper wines outperforming more expensive ones when judged by experts.
How good were the wines?
Would have been really good to have a bunch of "wine experts" blind taste the same wines and see how their perceptions matched the general public. It might be that the 'public' were super accurate and it was a freak set of wines where the cheap ones really were as good as the expensive ones. I've had a £15 Bordeaux that I thought was more unbalanced than that Gran Tesoro. What if the people conducting the experiment uncovered bargain priced hidden gems? Or had some overpriced stinkers?
We know that qualified experts are pretty good blind tasters, they can usually tell what a wine is made from, how it was made, what's in it and where it was from. It's part of any good qualification system. So their opinion does carry some weight.
So how do you judge quality anyway?
Whilst the experts might be able to tell what a wine is and where it was from you only need to take a look around at wildly different scoring systems to appreciate that even amongst the experts there can be wild disagreement about how good a particular wine is.
Not only that but there are a load of different 'tasting systems' that judge wine on slightly different things.
You could take 580 members of the public to a gallery, show them a nice Art Student's painting and a Pollock and ask them which was more expensive. I suspect you'd get similar results.
Conclusions
So, taking all those points together, would you expect the average punter to be able to identify the price of a wine based on a blind taste? To be able to pick a price of a wine you really have to understand, what the wine is, where it comes from, how it was made and what the quality is. That's not easy. We had to do it as part of our WSET courses, and whilst I got the price right on the exam, I know that in the practices I frequently got it horribly wrong.
The thing I agree with is that, if you don't really care about wine, you might as well spend £5* as £20 on a bottle. And sometimes, when you do care about wine, you are better off spending £5 on a bargain than £20 on some overpriced monstrosity. Just like there'd be no point paying for the Pollock if you thought the Art Student's painting would look nicer on your wall.
So, with all that in mind why wasn't the headline "a small number of the general public perform just as averagely at a slightly crap experiment about tasting wine as you'd expect" and why is it a front page of the website story?
*or £3 if you find a decent one!
Tuesday 22 February 2011
Benares
I went with the wife and a couple of friends to Benares for lunch on Saturday. We had the Grazing menu with wine, and it was amazing. The food was fantastic but the wine matching was absolutely superb. The grazing menu consists of an amuse bouche, plus 4 courses each of which is a trio of tasters. Which come with 5 wines.
So most of the wines have to match 3 dishes, which is incredibly hard. But it was amazingly successful.
The Amuse Bouche was a little crispy fried mozarella ball, with a coriander and chilli puree and served with Atul's Signature Sauvignon Blanc 2008, Domaine du Grande Mayne, France. Great acid cut through the cheese the whole thing was really light and herby.
Soave "La Rocca" Pieropan 2008 accompanied curry leaf and Tarragon infused Lobster Rilet, Prawns Pickled with Indian Five Spice and Confit Duck Terrine with Orange Jelly.
Journey's End Chardonnay 2009 went with Tandoori Monkfish Tail with Squid Ink Mayonnaise, Chilli and Garlic Marinated Chicken Tikka and Tandoor Roasted Pigeon with Vanilla Beetroot.
Muddy Water Pinot Noir 2008, had to cope with Sea Bass with Kadhai Mushrooms, Seared Tiger Prawn with Celeriac Pureer and Spiced Lamb Kofta with Punjabi Chickpeas and Rogan Jus
Dessert was Pear Sorbet, Star Anise infused Dark Chocolate Mouse and Poached William Pear with Paul Cluver Riesling Late Harvest 2008, South Africa
All completely amazing, the wine matches were fantastic, and surprising. The Soave and the Chardonnay were particular surprises for me, not normally styles I would have thought I'd like but both fantastic.
We went to Atul Kochhar's other restaurant Vatika last year, and had the tasting menu with wine there, that was also spectacular but I completely failed to tell you all about it, sorry.
So most of the wines have to match 3 dishes, which is incredibly hard. But it was amazingly successful.
The Amuse Bouche was a little crispy fried mozarella ball, with a coriander and chilli puree and served with Atul's Signature Sauvignon Blanc 2008, Domaine du Grande Mayne, France. Great acid cut through the cheese the whole thing was really light and herby.
Soave "La Rocca" Pieropan 2008 accompanied curry leaf and Tarragon infused Lobster Rilet, Prawns Pickled with Indian Five Spice and Confit Duck Terrine with Orange Jelly.
Journey's End Chardonnay 2009 went with Tandoori Monkfish Tail with Squid Ink Mayonnaise, Chilli and Garlic Marinated Chicken Tikka and Tandoor Roasted Pigeon with Vanilla Beetroot.
Muddy Water Pinot Noir 2008, had to cope with Sea Bass with Kadhai Mushrooms, Seared Tiger Prawn with Celeriac Pureer and Spiced Lamb Kofta with Punjabi Chickpeas and Rogan Jus
Dessert was Pear Sorbet, Star Anise infused Dark Chocolate Mouse and Poached William Pear with Paul Cluver Riesling Late Harvest 2008, South Africa
All completely amazing, the wine matches were fantastic, and surprising. The Soave and the Chardonnay were particular surprises for me, not normally styles I would have thought I'd like but both fantastic.
We went to Atul Kochhar's other restaurant Vatika last year, and had the tasting menu with wine there, that was also spectacular but I completely failed to tell you all about it, sorry.
Wednesday 8 September 2010
Berry Brothers Wedding List
When we got married we had a Wedding Gift List from Majestic. Looks like Berry Brothers now also do a wedding list. And you can set theirs up online. Much easier.
Wednesday 18 August 2010
Drink Whisky, save the planet?
Some people at Edinburgh Napier University worked out that you can use whisky by-products to produce bio-fuels. I wonder if it makes your car smell peaty?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
